Do not worry, I will now not also be political on this blog. I have, I must admit, to this day do not work with the substance of what Barack Obama promises everything / promised added. ( Photo: Obama Campaign )
No, I'm just thrilled by the idea that it is indeed possible that in a country where creationists still literally in the act of creation, as in The Bible describes faith, believe
in which many people even the Grand Canyon was created during running of the Flood,
call in the still tens of millions of people people with different skin color as "nigger",
in which the application death penalty, Guantanamo, and torture as an interrogation method to be defended publicly,
that it is possible in a country that newcomer African-American majority is elected president.
If you only want, then unimaginable is possible!
in my blog articles on the future of the pigeon sport, "I have a core point attempts as the most important in securing the future to highlight: the acquisition of new members to our sport. And as a very important prerequisite for this, I led the abolition of the structural disadvantages of small pigeon populations. For current breeders with winter flocks of 30-40 birds as much less chance of an RV Cup or one of the many other "best X doves" have to win championships. Once one considers the number of take into pigeons Meisterschaftsmodi set as a criterion would be with, here is a marked improvement in the opportunities for the small stocks, where!
But whenever the discussion with other (! In most successful) farmers comes to speak to this point, I observe the following behaviors:
1) The fact that for example, 50 pigeons set more opportunities in five 2-digit on offer the end of the season as 15 seeded pigeons shall be contributed simply and totally without logic.
2) The withdrawal of the incentive for high number of pigeons is considered a threat to the revenue of the RVen. When I try to portray that, ultimately, not the pigeons bear the costs, but the breeder, it is not so relvant how many pigeons are eingekorbt, but as many people as breeders of the flights on which to spread the cost (no matter how the allocation formula may look here, see also believe Blog post "Future Concept Part 1"), this is simply ignored.
3) It tries to quickly change the subject.
4) The problem is shown to be irrelevant. Say, they say almost: It is important that in our sport currently has only set the breeder with many pigeons, too realistic chances of the main competitions!
one asks but these breeders in which farmers would prefer to establish a dove for my breeding: From large breeders winter population of 200 pigeons, Abo-RV-champion and an AS-bird or a small breeder with 40 doves winter population which, although still only 3 to 5 RV Masters, but is also an AS-bird, the answer is: "From the small breeder". The successful small farmers, it shows the great yet is clearly the more attractive shock!
It is therefore well aware that this little impact is the better impact, and yet you denied him the equal chance at the 1 Championship!
Many of these farmers who are in these discussions behave as described above and argued elsewhere speak as if one saw that it was time to do something for the pigeon racing, as he put yes in the crisis. They like to donate a good pigeon, or ten, or even give the RV a few thousand dollars for the Kabi. But from my point of view, they do yet so nothing sustainable to maintain the pigeon sport. It may actually put the good intention behind it, but it is objectively on maintaining the status quo that comes to their best! If
but have small impacts less likely and it is also more difficult for the general mass, pigeon racing to operate with a large population, there should be aware of how dangerous this status quo is the pigeon sport for the sustainable survival!
The number of those who can only hold a small stock, namely the huge and potential members of this group is given away by the current situation!
These are people who are not so much money to spend on pigeons, people who are prevented because of zoning regulations on larger stocks, people in urban areas, people with a series of small houses and little land, people with physical limitations of cost (more pigeons more power ), people with time limitations (more pigeons cost more time ),... But
these people are not at all recognized this potential more than pigeon breeders!
But who has he identified in the boom time of the pigeon sport, the majority of breeders? Was it the big breeders, or was it the farmers with small holdings?
had time to play the "small farmers" also encourage pigeons, even if he had with the "best X Championships" no chance. Because a) he had a large number of many other "little" side. And b) was the money play a main driver and not the championship. Both are no longer the case! Many small farmers so listen to either frustrated or not even start because they think that with so few pigeons It makes no sense anyway.
I asked all breeders:
What speaks against it, to eliminate the structural division before large shocks in the major championships, by amending this Meisterschaftsmodi?
presses you do not even around to answer that question! Answer it honestly from yourself! And then you wonder, you really want that pigeon racing is maintained in Germany, or do you just prefer that nothing changes?
The status quo is, however, on short or long ohnenhin change (see number of new and young farmers in the RVen)! Who is this realization denied, and just trying to preserve the status quo says, virtually, 'After me the deluge!
the receipt of the pigeon sport, we really need to do and not do just that! But we need to change and be willing to forego one or the other cherished advantage!
WE HAVE ONLY WANT HONEST, YOU CAN ALSO GET SOME!
0 comments:
Post a Comment